April 22, 2008

CALIFORNIA EVIDENCE - TESTIMONY RE: EVIDENCE BEING SENT TO DEFENSE LABORATORY

A Police expert testified that she did not test blood on a ring because it would have consumed it in case it had to be tested again, and that the evidence had been "released to a defense lab." Defense counsel objected, but not on the grounds raised on appeal.

Held, even if claims are cognizable, the testimony did not violate the work product privilege as it applies to criminal cases (only "core" work product protected; see Garcia v. Superior Court (2007) 42 Cal.4th 63, 63, fn. 2).

The Court refuses to reach constitutional issues regarding the admission of the testimony because trial counsel did not object on constitutional grounds, leaving a writ of Habeas Corpus open on that issue.
.
People v. Zamudio (Ca. Sup. Ct., 4/21/08, S074414) 08 C.D.O.S. 4544

Continue reading "CALIFORNIA EVIDENCE - TESTIMONY RE: EVIDENCE BEING SENT TO DEFENSE LABORATORY" »

April 19, 2008

SAN DIEGO PROSECUTOR FORCED TO DISMISS CHARGES AGAINST INNOCENT WOMAN ACCUSED OF POISONING MARINE HUSBAND-SHAME ON THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY

In a shocking development for the general public, but a not-so-shocking development to seasoned defense attorneys, San Diego District Attorney Bonnie Dumanis has dropped murder charges against Cyntha Sommer.

The only evidence used to convict Sommers was contaminated. Even the prosecution's chief expert at the trial suggested that it might be contaminated. But the dismissal of SOmmer's case came only after the defense attorney demanded retesting of the tissue samples. There was no arsenic in them. There never was.

38041287.gif

The prosecutor trying the case, Laura Gunn, in an attempt to win a conviction at all costs, claimed Sommer's "motive" for killing her husband was to obtain the proceeds of his insurance policy. They put forth that after she obtained this policy, she puchased breast implants and partied. Murder for breast implants? That, plus contaminated "evidence" was the slim speclation the prosecutor used to convict an innocent woman.

I recently sent a letter to Dumanis outlining that I had learned the Sheriff's crime lab was involved in "switching" blood samples and attributing them to the wrong people, and keeping a lab witness on the public payroll who testifies falsely. Click HERE for article. And after that, San Diego attorney Mike Fremont caught a San Diego Police Department crime lab criminalist lying in the witness stand. A complaint to Dumanis yielded no action. Click HERE for article.

Shame on the San Diego District ttorney's Office.

By Dana Littlefield
STAFF WRITER

April 18, 2008

Cynthia Sommer, accused of fatally poisoning her Miramar Marine husband with arsenic, spent two years and four months behind bars. Yesterday, the 34-year-old mother of four walked out of the Las Colinas jail a free woman, after prosecutors dropped the murder case against her.

Prosecutors said they now have reasonable doubt that Sgt. Todd Sommer was poisoned, based on conclusions reached by a new set of toxicology experts.

San Diego Superior Court Judge John Einhorn granted the prosecutors' motion to dismiss “without prejudice,” meaning they have the option to refile charges later.

Cynthia Sommer's defense lawyer has said he plans to request a dismissal with prejudice.

District Attorney Bonnie Dumanis said at a news conference yesterday that her office acted appropriately, based on available evidence, when it charged Sommer with murder in March 2006 and tried her in January 2007. Sommer was arrested in Palm Beach County, Fla., in November 2005.

Prosecutors sought more forensic testing when defense attorneys raised questions about the evidence during and after the trial. Testing on other tissue samples from Todd Sommer revealed no arsenic.

Cynthia Sommer talked to her family on the phone yesterday after she was released from Las Colinas jail in Santee. Jacky Scott of Welcome Home Ministry was with her.
“Today justice was done,” Dumanis said. “This is how the system is supposed to work.

“As soon as we had the information that pointed to reasonable doubt, we brought this case this afternoon to get the matter dismissed,” she said, adding that prosecutors acted quickly “so that Sommer didn't spend any additional time in custody.”

Defense lawyer Allen Bloom was unconvinced.

“No one should say that this system worked,” he said. “This dismissal wasn't because of the prosecution's efforts; it was done because the defense demanded it.”

Todd Sommer, 23, died Feb. 18, 2002, after collapsing at the couple's home at the Miramar Marine Corps Air Station. Doctors first determined he died of natural causes, but tests later revealed high levels of arsenic in his liver and kidneys.

Witnesses testified during the trial that Cynthia Sommer slept with other men, partied heavily and used some of her husband's life insurance money to buy breast implants shortly after he died.

Prosecutor Laura Gunn argued that Sommer's behavior indicated she was “celebrating” rather than mourning.

On Jan. 30, 2007, a jury convicted her of first-degree murder and allegations of murder by poison and for financial gain. She faced a life sentence.

In December, a judge granted Sommer's request for a new trial, saying her former attorney, Robert Udell, made several mistakes that might have prejudiced jurors. Udell admitted he made some errors.

Bloom said jurors never should have heard about Sommer's partying and sexual behavior. He also said early tests on Todd Sommer's tissues were flawed and likely contaminated.

According to court documents, prosecutors learned in March that several of Todd Sommer's tissue samples had been stored at San Diego Naval Medical Center in Balboa Park. They were tested this month at a lab in Quebec, which found no arsenic.

Dr. Jean-Philippe Weber, the Quebec lab's former director, prepared a report stating that the previous test results were “physiologically improbable” and that contamination was possible.

Yesterday, Bloom reaffirmed his contention that Todd Sommer died of natural causes, as doctors determined initially.

“Young people and healthy people die from sudden cardiac arrest in our country every year,” Bloom said. “Todd Sommer was sadly was one of those people. I know he didn't die because of Cynthia Sommer.

Continue reading "SAN DIEGO PROSECUTOR FORCED TO DISMISS CHARGES AGAINST INNOCENT WOMAN ACCUSED OF POISONING MARINE HUSBAND-SHAME ON THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY" »

February 18, 2008

CALIFORNIA DUI DEFENSE NEWS: CRIME LAB CHIEF RESIGNS OVER PROBLEMS RAISED ON FAULTY DUI EVIDENCE

The head of the state labs in Washington that test crime evidence is stepping down, a move that prosecutors and defense lawyers say could help bring back lost confidence in the way drunken-driving cases are handled around the state.

Barry Logan's resignation, effective March 14, comes after a series of problems at the Washington State Patrol toxicology lab have cast doubts on breath tests for suspected drunken drivers.

The decision stunned attorneys who have worked with Logan on criminal cases and saddened his staff, leaving some in tears, but the lab has drawn stinging criticism about errors and ethical problems in recent months.

"Too many things went wrong on his watch," said defense attorney Francisco Duarte, who specializes in DUI cases. "I believe he wanted to run a laboratory that was based on integrity -- and ultimately, he failed to do so."

DUI attorney Ted Vosk, who has worked to uncover problems at the lab and has persuaded judges to throw out many breath-test results, said he believed Logan's departure was appropriate.

"His stepping down now seems to represent, at least in my mind, that we were right," Vosk said.

BEER.jpg

Continue reading "CALIFORNIA DUI DEFENSE NEWS: CRIME LAB CHIEF RESIGNS OVER PROBLEMS RAISED ON FAULTY DUI EVIDENCE" »

February 14, 2008

WASHINGTON STATE CRIME LAB CHIEF RESIGNS AFTR PROBLEMS RAISED ON DUI EVIDENCE

Seattle, Washington:

The head of the Washingtin state labs that test crime evidence is stepping down, a move that prosecutors and defense lawyers say could help bring back lost confidence in the way drunken-driving cases are handled around the state.

Barry Logan's resignation, effective March 14, comes after a series of problems at the Washington State Patrol toxicology lab have cast doubts on breath tests for suspected drunken drivers.

"Barry has done an excellent job of addressing the issues during this difficult period," State Patrol Chief John Batiste said. "But he and I agree that forward momentum will require different leadership."

The decision stunned attorneys who have worked with Logan on criminal cases and saddened his staff, leaving some in tears, but the lab has drawn stinging criticism about errors and ethical problems in recent months.

"Too many things went wrong on his watch," said defense attorney Francisco Duarte, who specializes in DUI cases. "I believe he wanted to run a laboratory that was based on integrity -- and ultimately, he failed to do so."

DUI attorney Ted Vosk, who has worked to uncover problems at the lab and has persuaded judges to throw out many breath-test results, said he believed Logan's departure was appropriate.

"His stepping down now seems to represent, at least in my mind, that we were right," Vosk said.

lab.jpg


Continue reading "WASHINGTON STATE CRIME LAB CHIEF RESIGNS AFTR PROBLEMS RAISED ON DUI EVIDENCE" »

December 2, 2007

BALTIMORE MURDER CONVICTION REVERSED FOR USE OF FAULTY BULLET EVIDENCE

A Murder Conviction Torn Apart by a Bullet
In a 1995 Maryland Case, Key Testimony and the Science Behind It Have Been Discredited

By John Solomon
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, November 19, 2007; Page A01

Former Baltimore police sergeant James A. Kulbicki stared silently from the defense table as the prosecutor held up his off-duty .38-caliber revolver and assured jurors that science proved the gun had been used to kill Kulbicki's mistress.

"I wonder what it felt like, Mr. Kulbicki, to have taken this gun, pressed it to the skull of that young woman and pulled the trigger, that cold steel," the prosecutor said during closing arguments.

Information from Joseph Kopera, who worked as a firearms expert for the Maryland State Police, was used to convict James A. Kulbicki of murder.

Prosecutors had linked the weapon to Kulbicki through forensic science. Maryland's top firearms expert said that the gun had been cleaned and that its bullets were consistent in size with the one that killed the victim. The state expert could not match the markings on the bullets to Kulbicki's gun. But an FBI expert took the stand to say that a science that matches bullets by their lead content had linked the fatal bullet to Kulbicki.

The jurors were convinced, and in 1995 Kulbicki was convicted of first-degree murder in the death of his 22-year-old girlfriend. He was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole.

For a dozen years, Kulbicki sat in state prison, saddled with the image of the calculating killer portrayed in the 1996 made-for-TV movie "Double Jeopardy."

Then the scientific evidence unraveled.

Earlier this year, the state expert committed suicide, leaving a trail of false credentials, inaccurate testimony and lab notes that conflicted with what he had told jurors. Two years before, the FBI crime lab had discarded the bullet-matching science that it had used to link Kulbicki to the crime.

Now a judge in Baltimore County is weighing whether to overturn Kulbicki's conviction in a legal challenge that could have ripple effects across Maryland. The case symbolizes growing national concerns about just how far forensic experts are willing to go to help prosecutors secure a conviction.

"If this could happen to my client, who was a cop who worked within this justice system, what does it say about defendants who know far less about the process and may have far fewer resources to uncover evidence of their innocence that may have been withheld by the prosecution or their scientific experts?" said Suzanne K. Drouet, a former Justice Department lawyer who took on Kulbicki's case as a public defender.

Prosecutors are fighting to uphold Kulbicki's conviction, arguing that there is still plenty of evidence that proves his guilt.

"While much of the evidence against the petitioner falls into the category of circumstantial evidence, the state presented a mountain of evidence, both direct and circumstantial," prosecutors argued in a motion earlier this year opposing Kulbicki's request for a new trial.

Police had lots of circumstantial evidence. A jacket with the victim's blood on the sleeve was found hanging in Kulbicki's closet. And four bone chips and a bullet fragment were found in his truck. Tiny drops of blood also were found in the truck, and one spot of blood on the holster of his off-duty weapon. But the blood spots were so small and their quality so poor that they could not be matched to the victim.

Continue reading "BALTIMORE MURDER CONVICTION REVERSED FOR USE OF FAULTY BULLET EVIDENCE" »

October 31, 2007

SAN DIEGO CRIME LAB EMPLOYEE TESTIFIES FALSELY; SAN DIEGO DUI ATTORNEY DEMANDS PROSECUTION

When I last posted in the Dirty Tricks in the Crime Lab Section, I told you about how San Diego Superior Court Judge Mike Smyth - when he was a chief prosecutor at the San Diego Office of the City Attorney - had written to the San Diego Sheriff's Department in 1995 complaining that San Diego Sheriff's lab analyst Belen Hebreo testified incompetently in DUI cases. Ms. Hebreo even testified in a murder case I handled. No one ever told me about the hidden truths about Ms. Hebreo's historically false testimony.

Nothing was done, the complaint was ignored, and Smyth and his coven of unethical prosecutors continued to use Ms. Hebreo without a single prosecutor ever alerting defense attorneys about her false testimony. I found out about it fully 11 years after Smyth, now a judge, wrote that damning letter.

Now, San Diego DUI Defense Attorney Michael Fremont is making claims that a San Diego Police Department lab criminalist testified falsely in the case of People v. Poitrowski.

In a letter obtained by me from Fremont to San Diego District Attorney Bonnie Dumanis, dated October 29, 2007, Fremont asks Dumanis to charge San Diego Police Department criminalist Larry Dale with perjury because "he did not tell the truth as to the ASCLAD accreditation for the crime of breath testing."

He goes on to say "The statement made by Dale on direct that 'every part of the lab has been accredited in terms of how they do business, under ASCLAD' was in fact false and constitutes perjury. An investigation should be opened and he should be charged."

Fremont has not yet received a response from Ms. Dumanis.

Note: When it was revealed that former San Diego Sheriff's department criminalist Ray Cole had falsified his resume to include that he had earned a degree in pre-medicine, neither DA Dumanis nor San Diego City Attorney Mike Aguirre took action, even though Cole had testified in hundreds - if not thousands - of DUI, DUI w/injury and DUI homicide cases over more than 15 years. Can we expect anything more from this new allegation? Don't hold your breath. Prosecutors in San Diego stand by the old addage "the ends justify the means." In other words, "whatever it takes to win"

June 22, 2007

SAN DIEGO PROSECUTORS ALLOWED INCOMPETENT LAB ANALYST TO TESTIFY FALSELY IN DUI CASES FOR YEARS

After much toil and trouble, I was finally able to get my hands on the sustained complaints from the San Diego Sheriff's Department on one of their crime lab people who has been testifying falsely in San Diego DUI cases for 12 years..

Sheriff's Legal Advisor, Sanford Toyen, attempted for months to block me from obtaining these records. After a threat of litigation, he finally came up with three very damning letters from prosecutors complaining about the ineptitude of San Diego Crime Lab Analyst Belen Hebreo.

The first letter, dated November 16, 1995, is authoried by Thomas Zeleny. Zeleny was then a deputy city attorney in the criminal trial division. What he says is damning. Apparently on November 8, 1995, Zeleny called Ms. Hebreo as an "expert" witness in a San Diego DUI case. The trial was before Judge Howard Shore. After the trial, Zeleny reports that Judge Shore told him Ms. Hebreo had "no business being on the witness stand." The judge questioned Ms. Hebreo's claim that she had been qualified as an expert witness 25 times before because she was, in his estimation, the "worst" lab witness he'd ever seen."

803100_lab_work.jpg

Zeleny goes on to talk about how Ms. Hebreo just made things up on the witness stand; i.e. she claimed that Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus is masked by tolerance. Then she switched up and reversed herself, saying it wasn't. Then she testified that if someone were physically impaired, it doesn't mean they are mentally impaired. After lots of prodding, Zeleny said she "gave the correct response."

Zeleny then began to give Hebreo a hypothetical, and she couldn't wait for him to finish before she began testifying that the defendant was under the influence. She kept cutting off the prosecutor before he was finished causing so much hysteria in the courtroom that, "I also noticed the jury could barely contain their laughter as juror's faces turned red trying not to make any noise and faces became tense trying not to smile."

Alright, on to the next complaint......

Continue reading "SAN DIEGO PROSECUTORS ALLOWED INCOMPETENT LAB ANALYST TO TESTIFY FALSELY IN DUI CASES FOR YEARS" »